Abstract geometric composition illustrating the peloton ad was fine. the brand was not

December 2019 ยท Advertising

The Peloton Ad Was Fine. The Brand Was Not.

Thirty seconds did not create the discomfort people felt, it just gave them somewhere to put a suspicion they already had about the company.

I was in line at Stumptown on Tuesday behind two people doing impressions of a woman on an exercise bike. They had the wide eyes. They had the voice. Neither of them owns a Peloton and neither of them was ever going to buy one.

The ad is thirty seconds long. A husband gives his wife a bike for Christmas, she films herself riding it for a year, she shows him the footage. That is the entire thing.

I have watched it maybe eight times now, looking for the offense inside the frames. It is not there. The lighting is good, the edit is clean, the performance is fine. By any craft measure, that agency did its job.

The problem arrived before the first frame.

Thirty seconds did not create that discomfort, the spot simply gave people somewhere to put a suspicion they had been carrying about this company for two years.

Peloton has spent those years building a very specific idea of itself: a bike that costs more than two thousand dollars, a subscription on top of it, a leaderboard, a wall of instructors asking you for more. That combination says something the marketing never says out loud, which is that improvement is purchasable and the purchase is large. Most of the time the brand keeps that idea flattering. Put it in a living room on Christmas morning, aim it at a thin woman who appears to be doing it for her husband, and the flattering version collapses.

The stock moved this week. I do not think the market was reacting to a commercial. I think the market was reacting to a company discovering, in public, what its brand actually means to people who do not already own one.

That gap is the real finding. Inside the building, Peloton is a fitness community. Outside it, Peloton is a status object with a monthly bill. Both readings are honest. Only one of them was in the brief.

I have watched this from inside brand strategy rooms. We test the execution. We almost never test the premise, because the premise is the thing everyone agreed on eighteen months ago and nobody has budget to reopen. So the research comes back clean, the spot ships, and the accumulated meaning of the brand does the rest.

The problem arrived before the first frame.

Karaoke Thursday, sticky floor, a host who calls everyone baby, eleven people and all of us bad. I sang badly and with total commitment. Nobody is charting my improvement and nobody is filming it, and that is closer to community than any leaderboard I have seen.