Abstract geometric composition illustrating a celebrity partnership is a loan against your reputation

October 2022 ยท Brand Strategy

A Celebrity Partnership Is a Loan Against Your Reputation

You borrow their meaning, and they can change what it means at any time without consulting you.

My group chat of former agency people woke up before I did on Tuesday. Forty unread messages, all of them some version of the same sentence, which was: what do you think Adidas does now.

Ye wore a White Lives Matter shirt at his Paris show on Monday. By Tuesday morning the brands attached to his name were being asked, publicly, what they intended to do about it. Adidas has the Yeezy line and a partnership it already said in the spring it was reviewing. Gap built a whole product strategy on the collaboration. Balenciaga had him on a runway. None of them got a phone call first.

That last part is the whole lesson.

A celebrity partnership is not an asset you buy, it is a loan you take against your own reputation, and the lender can change the terms whenever they feel like it.

I have watched this from inside brand strategy rooms and the pitch is always seductive, because the math looks free. You get instant cultural meaning. You get a shortcut past ten years of patient brand building. You borrow somebody's relationship with an audience you have not earned, and for a while the interest payments are invisible.

They are not invisible. They are deferred. Accenture spent years making a person the literal face of high performance and then unwound it in a weekend in 2009. Nike carried Lance Armstrong until 2012 and had to explain, at length, what it knew and when. Papa John's had to detach itself from the man in the logo. In every case the brand did not do anything wrong. It just co-signed.

Here is the part that gets lost in the excitement of the announcement. The stronger the partnership, the harder the exit. If the collaboration is a limited drop, you let it lapse and say nothing. If you have built a product line, a supply chain, a store fixture program and three seasons of forward inventory around one person's name, you cannot quietly walk away. You have to make a statement, and the statement itself becomes a news event, and now your brand values are being graded in public on a deadline you did not set.

So the question to ask before signing is not whether this person is on brand today. It is what your company sounds like in the press release where you end it. If you cannot draft that paragraph, you are not ready to borrow.

You borrow somebody's relationship with an audience you have not earned, and for a while the interest payments are invisible.

It rained all afternoon and I walked to Stumptown to think about this instead of writing it. The brands that outlast this news cycle will be the ones whose meaning was theirs to begin with, built slowly, at their own expense, in their own name.