Abstract geometric composition illustrating your sustainability story now has an audience of one: your investors

January 2020 ยท Brand Strategy

Your Sustainability Story Now Has an Audience of One: Your Investors

For a decade sustainability messaging was aimed at consumers who mostly did not change their behavior. The letter that landed this week aimed it somewhere with teeth.

I spent most of Tuesday in a conference room off Burnside, looking at a forty slide sustainability deck. Recycled fiber content. A compostable mailer pilot. A photograph of a forest that I am fairly certain came from a stock library. The client asked whether consumers would care, and I said what I always say, which is that they will tell a survey they care and then buy the cheaper package.

Then Larry Fink's annual letter to CEOs landed and the room got quiet.

BlackRock manages something in the neighborhood of seven trillion dollars. When the person sitting on that pile writes to every chief executive he invests in and says climate risk is investment risk, that is not a values statement. That is a covenant. He is talking about reallocating capital, voting against boards, treating disclosure as a condition of ownership.

Which changes who the deck is for.

For ten years sustainability messaging has been written for a consumer who mostly did not change, and this week it acquired a reader who can actually move money.

Three things break when the audience shifts. One, the claims get audited. Copy like committed to a greener future survives a consumer audience because nobody follows up. It does not survive an investor audience, because investors employ analysts whose entire job is following up. Two, materiality starts to matter more than sentiment. A shopper responds to the compostable mailer. A portfolio manager wants to know what a carbon price does to your cost of goods in 2030, and those are not the same document. Three, the relationship does not end. Campaigns have flight dates. Capital does not.

The brands that will handle this well are the ones who were never running sustainability out of marketing in the first place. Patagonia has been publishing supply chain detail that made its own lawyers nervous for years. Interface rebuilt a manufacturing process instead of a tagline. Unilever tied the whole thing to product performance and reported against it on a schedule, which is boring, and which is exactly the point.

Campaigns have flight dates. Capital does not.

The uncomfortable part, for those of us who write this material, is that the work gets harder and less fun. Fewer forests. More footnotes. I told the client to cut the deck to twelve slides and put the operations lead in the room next time, which went over about as well as you would expect.

Then I went home and explained all of it to Truffles, who has never once considered a discount rate applied to physical risk, and to Barnaby, who was asleep in the recycling bin. A compostable one.