Abstract geometric composition illustrating snap says it is a camera company and wall street believed it

March 2017 ยท Platforms & Media

Snap Says It Is a Camera Company and Wall Street Believed It

Calling yourself something you are not yet is either the boldest positioning move of the year or an expensive way to avoid a fair comparison.

I read the Snap S-1 standing up at Ovation, on my phone, because every seat was taken and I did not want to wait until I got home. The first line of the letter is not a mission statement and not a hedge. Snap Inc. is a camera company.

That was five days ago. The stock priced at seventeen, opened at twenty four, and closed its first day worth more than Target. The sentence has been argued about in every marketing conversation I have had since, including two I started.

The objection is easy. Snap does not make cameras in any way that shows up on a balance sheet. It makes an app. It also makes Spectacles, sunglasses that shoot video and get sold out of a yellow vending machine, and you could fit every pair sold so far into a decent sized theater.

So the line is not a description. It was never supposed to be.

A category claim is not a statement about what you sell. It is an argument about who you should be measured against.

Measured as a social network, Snap loses on arithmetic. Facebook has close to two billion people. Instagram copied Stories in August and has been taking the format ever since. Every quarter for the rest of Snap's life, an analyst will put daily active user growth on a slide and the comparison will be unkind.

Measured as a camera company, the question becomes whether people point the thing at things, and the answer is roughly two and a half billion times a day. Same company. Different verdict. The category you claim decides which numbers count as evidence.

Here is the part that gets lost. A category claim is a promise you have to keep building toward, not a costume you put on for the road show. GoPro spent two years calling itself a media company while the market kept scoring it on hardware, because the media never arrived. The claim was not wrong. It was unfunded.

The category you claim decides which numbers count as evidence.

Which is why the test for Snap is not whether Wall Street believed the sentence last week. Wall Street believes a lot of sentences in March. The test is whether there is a camera in the room three years from now that nobody else built. If the only camera is still the one already in your pocket, the line stops reading as bold and starts reading as defensive, and everybody will remember exactly where it was printed.

Your brand can do this too, and much more cheaply than an IPO. Pick the comparison you want to survive, then go earn it. I tried to photograph Truffles this morning and got a blur and one accusing eye. No category claim in the world fixes that.