Abstract geometric composition illustrating patagonia told you not to buy their jacket (you bought it anyway)

April 2018 ยท Brand Strategy

Patagonia Told You Not to Buy Their Jacket (You Bought It Anyway)

Anti-consumption messaging from a brand that sells things. Paradox or strategy?

There is a Patagonia store in the Pearl and I walked past it twice on Saturday before admitting I was going in. I was not shopping. I wanted to look at a jacket I already own, on a rack, with a price tag on it, the way a person sees it before deciding anything.

The jacket is the R2. The ad that made it famous ran on Black Friday in 2011: a full page in the Times, the coat photographed flat against white, two words sitting on top of it. Don't Buy This Jacket.

Sales went up.

Everyone in this industry knows that part. It shows up in decks as proof that reverse psychology moves product, which is the laziest available reading. I have watched it get read that way from inside brand strategy rooms, usually about ninety seconds before somebody suggests we try something bold.

Patagonia was not being clever. They made a claim they were willing to be audited on, and the willingness is the whole asset.

Look at what shipped alongside the ad. One, the copy carried its own math: the water that jacket consumed to exist, the carbon it emitted, the waste left behind. Numbers a reporter could check and a competitor could dispute. Two, it carried infrastructure. The Common Threads pledge, the repair program, the trade-in racks, an actual building in Reno full of people sewing zippers back onto coats. Told you not to buy the thing and then gave you three ways to not buy it. Three, it could lose. A company that tells you to buy less has to survive people buying less.

Compare that to how most brands handle the same territory. A values page nobody links to. A line about recycled content in the fourth paragraph of a press release. A post in April with a leaf in it. None of those can fail, which is exactly why none of them mean anything. A claim that cannot cost you is not a position, it is decor.

Told you not to buy the thing and then gave you three ways to not buy it.

The uncomfortable part is that this does not transfer. You cannot borrow the ad. If your supply chain will not survive a footnote, do not publish the footnote, because somebody will read it out loud on Twitter. The move is not to say the brave thing. The move is to build the thing that makes the brave thing true, and then say it plainly.

I bought the R2 in 2013. The left sleeve carries a repair from a fence in Forest Park, done at the counter for free, which is the part of the strategy nobody photographs. Truffles sleeps on it whenever I leave it on the chair. Barnaby has opinions about that arrangement. Neither of them has ever bought anything.