Abstract geometric composition illustrating brands were quiet during the midterms and nobody noticed

July 2018 ยท Culture

Brands Were Quiet During the Midterms and Nobody Noticed

Selective activism is still activism. Selective silence is still silence.

I voted in Oregon's May primary in a church basement off Southeast Hawthorne, then walked up to Ovation for a coffee and scrolled my feed for twenty minutes while it cooled. Nothing. Not one word from a single brand I follow.

Four months earlier, most of those same accounts had something to say within a day of the February school walkouts. Avatars changed. Statements went up. One was worded so carefully it took me three reads to locate the verb.

Now it is primary season heading into the midterms, and the feed is peach iced tea and summer bundles.

Which is exactly the tell.

A brand that speaks only when speaking is safe has not taken a position on anything except its own risk tolerance.

Here's the part that gets lost. Silence is not neutral, it is a choice with a media plan behind it. Somebody sat in a Tuesday meeting and decided this one was too hot, and that decision is every bit as much a brand act as the post they did run in February.

Look at who is not being quiet. Patagonia spent last December telling people the president stole their land, and then kept saying it, on the homepage, long past the news cycle. Dick's pulled assault-style rifles in February and ate the revenue. Levi's put real money into gun safety and said so in plain English. You can disagree with all three. You cannot claim you do not know where they stand.

Salt & Straw does a smaller version of this and gets less credit for it. The politics live in the flavors, the hiring, the copy on the pint carton, and they show up in July as readily as in October, because it is not a campaign. It is just what the company is.

Then look at the ones who posted in February and vanished by May. Their audience learned something too. They learned the position was rented.

The test I give clients is boring. Name the one issue you would speak on if it cost you a quarter of Q3. Not the issue your competitors have already made safe. If you cannot name one, you do not have values, you have a content calendar with a conscience setting.

Silence is not neutral, it is a choice with a media plan behind it.

I finished the coffee and walked back down Hawthorne past a hand-painted sign in a shop window telling me exactly what the owner thought about a ballot measure. Misspelled. Unhedged. Never once run past legal. That shop will still be saying it in November, and I have started to think that is the whole of it: the smaller the brand, the shorter the distance between what it believes and what it is willing to print.