Abstract geometric composition illustrating instagram blinked, and that's the point

July 2022 ยท Platforms & Media

Instagram Blinked, and That's the Point

If you work in brand strategy, you should be writing this down.

Last week, Instagram rolled back its TikTok-inspired changes after a wave of user backlash led by the Kardashians. Let me say that again: a platform with two billion users reversed course because Kim Kardashian posted a screenshot.

If you work in brand strategy, you should be writing this down.

When Glossier built a $1.2 billion valuation primarily through Instagram, they proved that a feed could be a storefront, a community, and a brand manifesto simultaneously. Their comments section did more brand-building than most companies' entire marketing budgets.

Here's what happened. Instagram had been testing a full-screen feed, pushing Reels aggressively, and surfacing recommended content from accounts you don't follow. Users hated it. They said so loudly. And then Kim and Kylie shared a Change.org petition that said "Make Instagram Instagram Again." Within days, Adam Mosseri was on camera saying they'd dial it back.

The strategic lesson here isn't about Instagram being weak. It's about what happens when you chase a competitor's value proposition instead of doubling down on your own.

Instagram's original white space was simple: beautiful, curated moments from people you actually know and follow. The aesthetic grid. The perfectly filtered brunch. It was a gallery, not a stage. TikTok's white space is entertainment from strangers, algorithmic discovery, raw and unpolished. Both are valid. Both are enormous businesses. But they are fundamentally different promises to the user.

When Instagram tried to become TikTok, it violated its own brand contract. And users revolted not because the features were bad, but because the experience felt like a betrayal.

I see this pattern constantly in client work. A brand watches a competitor succeed with a particular positioning and thinks, "We should do that too." But the reason your competitor succeeds is because they built trust around that specific promise. You have trust around a different one. Abandoning yours to chase theirs leaves you with neither.

Think about it like karaoke. If you're the person who always crushes "Don't Stop Believin'," nobody wants to see you suddenly attempt Kendrick Lamar. They came for Journey. Give them Journey.

If you're the person who always crushes "Don't Stop Believin'," nobody wants to see you suddenly attempt Kendrick Lamar.

The other fascinating piece is the power dynamic. Instagram is owned by Meta, a company with a market cap that dwarfs the GDP of most countries. And it bent to user pressure in a week. That's not because Meta is suddenly humble. It's because the switching cost for social platforms has never been lower. Your audience is one uninstall away from gone.

For brand strategists, the takeaway is threefold:

One: Your existing users are not a captive audience. They chose you for a reason. Honor that reason.

Two: Competitive response should strengthen your differentiation, not erase it. If your competitor zigs, the answer might be to zag harder.

Three: When your community tells you who they think you are, listen. That perception is your brand, whether you like it or not.

Instagram will keep pushing video. They have to. But the way they do it matters enormously. The brands that win long-term are the ones that evolve without abandoning their core identity. It's the difference between growth and mutation.

Kim Kardashian didn't kill Instagram's strategy. She just reminded them what their strategy was supposed to be.