Abstract geometric composition illustrating cnn+ lasted 31 days and the brand was the reason

April 2022 ยท Platforms & Media

CNN+ Lasted 31 Days and the Brand Was the Reason

Nobody wanted a subscription to a channel they already believed they owned.

Ovation had CNN on with the sound off last Thursday, the way half the coffee places in this city do. A muted anchor, a chyron nobody reads, weather in three cities none of us live in. I watched a guy glance up, confirm the world was still the world, and go back to his laptop.

That glance is the product. That is what CNN is.

Warner Bros. Discovery announced last week that CNN+ shuts down April 30. It launched March 29. Thirty one days. Several hundred million dollars, a newsroom staffed up, Chris Wallace pulled over from Fox, a launch campaign telling people to go download an app.

Everyone is filing this as a business failure. It was a brand failure wearing a business failure's coat.

You cannot sell a subscription to a thing your audience already believes they own.

CNN spent four decades teaching people exactly one lesson: we are the thing that is already on. Airports. Hotel gyms. The corner of the bar. The coffee shop with the sound off. Ambient, ubiquitous, free at the point of use. That is a real and valuable brand position, and CNN holds it more completely than any news organization alive.

Then it asked those same people for $5.99 a month, for a separate app, with different shows in it. Not the news they knew. News adjacent to the news they knew. The brand said always on. The product said log in.

Here's the part that gets lost in the postmortems. HBO Max works because HBO spent thirty years teaching people that the good stuff lives behind a gate and is worth the trip. Disney+ works because Disney taught people the vault is real and opens rarely. Both brands were pre-loaded with the idea of paying. CNN was pre-loaded with the opposite idea, and no amount of talent could unteach it in a month.

Netflix losing subscribers this month has half the industry deciding streaming is over. Streaming is not over. What is over is the assumption that a strong brand transfers cleanly into whatever business model you bolt onto it. Brand equity is specific. It is equity in a particular promise, made a particular way, and it does not convert to cash on demand.

The brand said always on. The product said log in.

So before you launch the new tier, the new membership, the new app, say out loud what your brand has trained people to expect for free. If the new thing contradicts it, you are not extending the brand. You are arguing with it, and you will lose, because you spent forty years building the other side of the argument.

Truffles sat on my laptop while I wrote this and Barnaby knocked a pen off the desk. Neither of them subscribed to anything. Smart cats.