Abstract geometric composition illustrating athlete activism in 2020 changed sports branding forever

April 2019 ยท Culture

Athlete Activism in 2020 Changed Sports Branding Forever

The bubble. The boycotts. The jersey messages. Sports became political brand space.

Twenty eight players on the United States women's national team sued their own federation last month, three months before they are supposed to go win a World Cup for it. I read the filing on my phone at Ovation with my coffee going cold, and what struck me was not the lawsuit. It was that nobody seemed surprised.

Ten years ago that filing would have been a crisis. Now it is a Wednesday.

Sports branding was built on neutrality. The athlete was a surface. You bought the surface, printed a logo on it, and sold the logo to everyone, because everyone is a bigger market than someone. Michael Jordan spent a career declining to have a public opinion and it made him the most valuable endorsement in history.

That model is finished, and the brands still running it are paying for a silence their audience no longer reads as neutral.

Nike proved it in public. The Kaepernick campaign last fall was supposed to be a catastrophe, and there were burning shoes on the internet for about a week, and then sales went up and the stock recovered and the campaign won everything there is to win. Every brand safety deck I have ever sat through assumed the opposite outcome.

What separated the brands that came out ahead was not the stance. It was whether they had earned the stance first. Nike had spent thirty years telling athletes to say something. LeBron had spent a decade building an argument about being more than an athlete before anyone told him to shut up and dribble. The position was already there. The moment only made it visible.

The brands that got hurt were the ones that discovered a value the same week they discovered a hashtag. A statement with no history behind it reads as a purchase, and everyone can see the receipt. Audiences can tell. They have gotten very good at telling.

I have watched this from inside brand strategy rooms, where the standard advice was to keep the athlete apolitical and the campaign universal. That advice was never about values. It was about not having to defend one.

What separated the brands that came out ahead was not the stance. It was whether they had earned the stance first.

I sat in the north end at Providence Park last season, where the Thorns supporters sing for ninety minutes and hang banners about things that have nothing to do with soccer. Twenty two thousand people. Nobody in that stand thinks sport is neutral. They never did. The brands are just catching up, expensively and late.